Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37105 (KAR)

SMT. YASHODAMMA v. SRI K S YOGESH

CCC/1637/2025 · 2026-08-27

Jayant Banerji, Tara Vitasta Ganju

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010832882025 NC: 2026:KHC:46350-DB CCC No. 1637 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1637 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. YASHODAMMA, WIFE OF CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT: NO.48, NEAR MUTHURAYASWAMY TEMPLE, SUNKADAKATTE, BENGALURU-560 091. …COMPLAINANT [BY SRI.BHARATH K., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: SRI K.S.YOGESH, SON OF K.G.SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT: NO.12, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS, AROGYA BADAVANE, ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 091. …ACCUSED (BY SRI.C.SHANKAR REDDY, ADVOCATE) THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 10 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF THE DELIBERATE AND WILFUL ACTS OF CONTEMPT Digitally signed by K S RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010832882025 NC: 2026:KHC:46350-DB CCC No. 1637 of 2025 COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED AND PASS AN ORDER SECURING THE PRESENCE OF THE ACCUSED BEFORE THIS HON’BLE COURT AND PUNISH THEM FOR COMMITTING CONTEMPT OF COURT OF ORDER DATED 12.08.2022 IN O.S.NO.6754/2017 PASSED BY THE LVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-59). THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) No one appears for the complainant. A deliberate and willful contempt by the accused of the order dated 12.08.2022 passed in OS No.6754/2017 by the LVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City (CCH-59), is alleged. It is evident that a decree of permanent injunction is granted restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's physical possession and enjoyment over the scheduled property. The decree is executable. Therefore, Contempt petition is consigned. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010832882025 NC: 2026:KHC:46350-DB CCC No. 1637 of 2025 This order has been passed in the presence of Sri.C.Shankar Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent. Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE KGR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25