Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37096 (CAL)

SUSMITA NAG v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/22751/2026 · 2026-09-01

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01/09 2026 AD/13/18 266312 NANDY (DAW) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/22751/2026 SUSMITA NAG VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. M.N. Roy, Advocate Mr. Biswarup Nandy, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Mr. Nilanjan Chatterjee, Advocate Ms. Manisha Paswan, Advocate ……for the State 1. Affidavit of service as filed be kept with the record. 2. As submitted by Mr. Roy, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner, the application being OA/58/2026 is pending consideration before the West Bengal State Administrative Tribunal; and hence, prayed for withdrawal. 3. In view of the decision in WPST/209/2025 and WPST/210/2025 (Anindo Sundar Das Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.), this writ-petition cannot be entertained. 4. Accordingly, WPA/22751/2026 is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2