Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3709 (JHR)

SHIV MUNDA ALIAS SHIBU v. THE STATE OF JAHRKHAND

B.A./394/2026 · 2026-02-25

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:5649 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 394 of 2026 Shiv Munda @ Shibu, aged about 21 years, son of Late Soma Singh Munda, Resident of Village Jojohatu, Tola Sosodih, Post Dalbhanga, Police Station Kuchai, District Seraikella Kharsawan ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P --- 02/25.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. No. 109 of 2025 arising out of Adityapur P.S. Case No. 341 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. No. 205 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 303(2)/317(4)/317(5)/3(5) of B.N.S. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of his so-called confessional statement in connection with Kuchai P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024 which has got no evidentiary values in the eyes of law. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and charge has already been framed in the instant case on 14.07.2025 and the petitioner is in custody since 25.02.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this Court. 4. Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the Petitioner. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner, coupled with the fact that the charge has already been framed on 14.07.2025 and also the fact that the petitioner 2026:JHHC:5649 2 is in custody since 25.02.2025; hence, I am inclined to enlarge the Petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above- named Petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of District and Additional Sessions Judge-II at Seraikella in connection with S.T. No. 109 of 2025 arising out of Adityapur P.S. Case No. 341 of 2024, corresponding to G.R. No. 205 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the Petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this Petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this Petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 25th February, 2026 jk Uploaded on 26/02/2026