Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3708 (RAJ)

KALURAM S/O RAMRATAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3991/2026 · 2026-03-16

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11070] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3991/2026 Kaluram S/o Ramratan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bhaton Ka Naya Gaon, P.s. Nainwa, District Bundi. (At Present Accused Confined In Sub Jail, Nainwa). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent/State For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naman Yadav Mr. Piyush Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 13/2026 registered at Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9 & 11(1)(D) of Prevention of Cruelty To Animals Act and under Sections 5/8 & 3/8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition Of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration Or Export Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; recovery has already been effected; He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 12.02.2026; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the [2026:RJ-JP:11070] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3991/2026] bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that recovery has already been effected; petitioner is behind the bars since 12.02.2026; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Kaluram S/o Ramratan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/114