Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37077 (PNJ)

RANJIT SINGH UPPAL v. PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION PSWC AND ANOTHER

CWP/23016/2026 · 2026-08-27

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP-23016-2026 Date of decision : 27.08.2026 Ranjit Singh Uppal ….Petitioner V/S Punjab State Warehousing Corporation and another ….Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. J.P. Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manbir Singh Batth, Advocate for the respondents. **** NAMIT KUMAR , J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 03.03.2026 (Annexure P-10), passed by respondent No.2/Appellate Authority, insofar as it upheld the findings against the petitioner and imposes the penalty of stoppage of two annual increments without cumulative effect and recovery of Rs.21,54,340/- upon the petitioner, while modifying the order dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P-7), passed by respondent No.1, whereby the penalty of stoppage of two annual increments with cumulative effect and recovery of Rs.21,78,413.33 has been imposed upon the petitioner and for quashing the order dated 24.02.2025 (Annexure P-7). 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition is fraught with inaccuracies, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 27.08.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) kothiyal JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.08.27 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document