Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37073 (PNJ)

YUSAF v. STATE OF HARYANA

CWP/28199/2026 · 2026-09-02

Divya Sharma, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28199-2026 Date of decision :02.09.2026 Yusaf and others ... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DIVYA SHARMA Present :- Mr. Ravindra Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 17.07.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Court of Assistant Collector Ist Class-cum-District Development of Panchayat Officer under Section 7(2) of the Village Common Land Act, 1961; the demarcation carried out vide order dated 25.07.2023 (Annexure P-6) by the Tehsildar, Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar and the report dated 27.09.2023 (Annexure P-8), vide which the digital encroachment list of Village Baroli Majra was issued against the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in case the demarcation report is used by the respondents-authority in the main proceedings, the petitioners would raise objection against the same in the POOJA SHARMA 2026.09.03 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28199-2026 -2- said proceedings and thus, seeks to withdraw the present petition with the aforesaid liberty. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. ( VIKAS BAHL ) JUDGE 02.09.2026 ( DIVYA SHARMA ) ps-I JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.09.03 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document