Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37073 (CHH)

Ganpat v. Shashaikant

SA/675/2017 · 2026-09-24

Smt Sushma Sawant

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010005152017 2026:CGHC:41789 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 675 of 2017 Ganpat, S/o. Bahadul, Aged About 57 Years, R/o. Village Siriyagarh, Tahsil Dabhara, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 – Shashaikant, S/o. Jeevanprakash Patel, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. Village Kusumjhar, Tahsil Dabhara, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2 – Yashpal, S/o. Jeevanprakash Patel, Aged About 60 Years, R/o. Village Kusumjhar, Tahsil Dabhara, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 3 – Jegiram, S/o. Ghashiram Chandra, Aged About 42 Years, R/o. Village Siriyagarh, Para Rathipali, Post Office Kawaljhar, Tahsil Dabhara, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2026.09.26 14:05:45 +0530 2 For Appellant : None appeared. For Respondent No.4 : Ms. K. Radhika, Panel Lawyer (Single Bench) Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant Order on Board 25.09.2026 1. This second appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment & decree dated 04.08.2017 passed by the learned Second Additional District Judge, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa in Civil Appeal No.22-A/2017. 2. Even in the second round of hearing, none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant; therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge Ashok