Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3705 (JK)

UT OF J AND K TH SHO POLICE STATION REASI v. MOHD SHOIB AND ANOTHER

CRM(M)/1123/2026 · 2026-10-05

Shahzad Azeem

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM(M) No. 1123/2026 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CRM(M) No. 1123/2026 CrlM No. 2034/2026 Date of Pronouncement:-05.10.2026 Uploaded on:- 05.10.2026 UT of J&K. …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Dewakar Sharma, Dy. AG. Vs. Mohd. Shoib and Anr. .…. Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE ORDER(ORAL) 01. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Section 439(2) of the Cr.PC read with Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short, “the BNSS”), seeking quashing/cancellation of bail granted to the respondents by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Reasi (hereinafter referred to as, “the trial Court”) in file No. 80/2026 titled, “Mohd. Shoib and Anr. Vs. UT of J&K” arising out of FIR No. 174/2025 of Police Station, Reasi for commission of offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 87, 127(2), 351(3) & 3(5) of the BNS. 02. The main ground for seeking indulgence of this Court is that, despite being apprised of the antecedents of the respondents, who have previously also indulged in similar activities and who have suppressed this fact, the trial Court granted an interim bail to the respondents vide order dated 08.05.2026 and further posted the matter for hearing on 18.05.2026. Serial No. 10 Regular Cause List CRM(M) No. 1123/2026 03. Admittedly, the respondents herein were admitted to interim bail and the matter is still pending on the docket of the trial Court. Therefore, the petitioner is required to first exhaust the remedy before the trial Court, which has granted the interim bail in favour of the respondents instead of invoking the extraordinary remedy under Section 439(2) of the Cr.PC read with Section 483(3) of BNSS. 04. Confronted with the above given facts and circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach the trial Court so as to avail the remedy as provide under law. 05. In view of above, the instant petition is disposed of at this stage with liberty as prayed for and in case, any such application is filed before the trial Court, the trial Court shall consider all the factual and legal please raised by the petitioner before passing a final order strictly in accordance with law. 06. Disposed of along with connected CrlM. (SHAHZAD AZEEM) JUDGE JAMMU 05.10.2026 Ram Krishan Ram Krishan 2026.10.05 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document