Serial No. 7 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CR 35/2026 Caveat 2041/2026 GHULAM RASOOL DAR ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Bilal Ahmad Khan, Advocate V/s MOHAMMAD QAZIM DAR AND OTHERS ….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Touseef Mohammad Khan, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE (ORDER) 05.10.2026 Caveat No. 2041/2026 01. With the appearance of learned counsel for the caveators. Caveat stands discharged. CR No. 35/2026 01. Petitioner has invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 115 CPC, against order dated 12.08.2026, passed by learned Special Mobile Magistrate/ PT&E, Srinagar, [“the trial Court”], whereby his review petition against closure of his evidence, in terms of order dated 16.06.2026, passed by the trial Court, came to be dismissed. 02. Learned counsel for the caveators/respondents has questioned maintainability of the present petition. Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 03. After arguing for a considerable time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case petitioner is allowed to examine witnesses No. 9 and 10, namely Mufti Nasrul Islam, (Chairman of Muslim Personal Board), Buspora, Srinagar and Khursheed Ahmad Kangoo, (Chairman of Akmali Trust), Hawal, Srinagar, of his own, within a time frame. 04. In order to cut short the controversy and having regard to the limited relief sought by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to examine the aforesaid two witnesses of his own within a period of three weeks and no more, failing which his evidence shall be deemed closed. It is made clear that no further time /adjournment shall be granted. 05. Disposed of along with connected CM(s). (RAJESH SEKHRI) JUDGE SRINAGAR 05.10.2026 “Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document