Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37037 (CAL)

JOSHPIN KUJUR v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER

WPA/418/2026 · 2026-08-31

Biswaroop Chowdhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR] *** WPA/418/2026 Joshpin Kujur Vs The Superintending Engineer and others Mr. Pardeshia Munda … for the petitioner Mr. S.C. Mishra … for the respondents August 31, 2026 [AKB] Item No.10 1. Learned advocates for the parties are present. Heard learned advocates. 2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that the respondent No. 2, The Assistant Engineer, Electricity Department, A&N Administration, Chouldari has failed and neglected to consider the application of the writ petitioner for grant of electricity connection. 3. In the facts and circumstances this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping the matter pending and direct the respondent to file affidavits. 4. Thus this writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the application of the writ petitioner for grant of electricity connection in accordance with law upon giving the writ petitioner and his learned advocate an opportunity of being heard. Such consideration and decision shall be made at an early date preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order. 2 5. With the above direction the writ petition stands disposed of. (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)