V SUJATHA v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER
WPA/435/2026 · 2026-08-31
Biswaroop Chowdhury
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37035 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 37035 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR] ***
WPA/435/2026
V.Sujatha
Vs
The Superintending Engineer and another
Mr. P. Kannan
… for the petitioner
Mr. S.C. Mishra
… for the respondents August 31, 2026 [AKB] Item No.11
1. Learned advocates for the parties are present.
2. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the writ petitioner that there are certain technical mistakes in the writ petition and many facts are not incorporated and he prays for leave to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to file afresh.
3. In the facts and circumstances leave is granted to the writ petitioner to withdraw the writ application and to file afresh if permissible as per law.
4. It is hereby made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case and all points of law will be kept open.
5. With the above direction the writ petition stands disposed of. (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)