- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010540862026 NC: 2026:KHC:44539 WP NO.24597 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.24597 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE KULUVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT MINNAPURA VILLAGE, THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRIKANTH N.V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHASILDAR NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 123. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20TH JULY, 2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010540862026 NC: 2026:KHC:44539 WP NO.24597 OF 2026 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FPRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Smt. B.P. Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 20th July, 2026 (Annexure-A), 3. Heard Sri. Srikanth N.V., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt. B.P. Radha, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on perusal of the averments made in the representation dated 20th July, 2026 (Annexure-A), it is forthcoming that the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.1 for not to grant the subject land to any - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010540862026 NC: 2026:KHC:44539 WP NO.24597 OF 2026 other authority. In view of the fact that the petitioner is not a owner of the subject land and she do not have any legal right over the same as on today, I am of the view that no interference be called for in this petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28