IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 221 RAM SINGH STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: Present : RAMESH KUMARI 1. The present petition has been filed under Section Section 439 of Cr.P.C.) petitioner has been implicated in criminal case arising Information Report FIR No. 31 2. The above noted criminal case had been registered on the basis of statement of the complainant who is father of victim on 17.04.2026 whereby, he informed the p On 17.04.2026, he and his wife went out to their respective work. His three children went to school. He returned at about 11.00 AM and when IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: RAM SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE Mr. Ravi Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Brijesh Sharma, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the complainant. **** RAMESH KUMARI, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Section Section 439 of Cr.P.C.) by the petitioner for grant of petitioner has been implicated in criminal case arising Information Report as detailed hereinunder: FIR No. Dated Sections 17.04.2026 6, 17 of POCSO Act, The above noted criminal case had been registered on the basis of statement of the complainant who is father of victim on 17.04.2026 whereby, he informed the police that he had three daughters and one son. On 17.04.2026, he and his wife went out to their respective work. His three children went to school. He returned at about 11.00 AM and when IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RM-M No.36501 of 2026 Date of decision: 27.08.2026 …. Petitioner …. Respondent JUSTICE RAMESH KUMARI , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Brijesh Sharma, A.A.G., Haryana. Mr. Krishan Singh, Advocate for the complainant. The present petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS (erstwhile by the petitioner for grant of regular bail as the petitioner has been implicated in criminal case arising out of First as detailed hereinunder:- Police Station 6, 17 of POCSO Act, Police Station Women, Yamuna Nagar, District Yamuna Nagar The above noted criminal case had been registered on the basis of statement of the complainant who is father of victim on 17.04.2026 olice that he had three daughters and one son. On 17.04.2026, he and his wife went out to their respective work. His three children went to school. He returned at about 11.00 AM and when (erstwhile as the First The above noted criminal case had been registered on the basis of statement of the complainant who is father of victim on 17.04.2026 olice that he had three daughters and one son. On 17.04.2026, he and his wife went out to their respective work. His three children went to school. He returned at about 11.00 AM and when JYOTI 2026.08.27 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document he entered the house he noticed that an unknown boy ran out of their room. He did not know the name and address of that boy and when he went inside the room and checked that boy had committed wrong act with his daughter. All her clothes were stained with blood. He asked his daughter who that boy was but his daughter was un time he went out and checked that the boy had run away from there. He prayed for taking action against the unknown boy who committed wrong act with his daughter and fled away from the spot. He also stated that condition of his daughte 3. After registration of criminal case, the victim was medico examined. Co completion of investigation, challan was presented against the present petitioner and co 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition is in judicial lock up since 21.04.2026. He had not committed the alleged offence. The allegation against him are wrong. He has been implicated in the present case just because of reason that one sale deed executed from him on 19.06.2025 and he had already filed a civil suit bearing No. CS/377/2026 for declaration which is pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar. He al he was residing in the same house. He prayed for his released on regular bail. CRM-M No.36501 of 2026 he entered the house he noticed that an unknown boy ran out of their room. He did not know the name and address of that boy and when he went inside the room and checked that boy had committed wrong act with his daughter. All her clothes were stained with blood. He asked his daughter who that boy was but his daughter was un time he went out and checked that the boy had run away from there. He prayed for taking action against the unknown boy who committed wrong act with his daughter and fled away from the spot. He also stated that condition of his daughter was quite bad. After registration of criminal case, the victim was medico examined. Co-accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama was arrested. After completion of investigation, challan was presented against the present petitioner and co-accused. counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition is in judicial lock up since 21.04.2026. He had not committed the alleged . The allegation against him are wrong. He has been implicated in the present case just because of reason that one sale deed executed from him on 19.06.2025 and he had already filed a civil suit bearing No. CS/377/2026 for declaration which is pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Bilaspur, Yamuna Nagar. He also submits that he is noticed in the CCTV footage because he was residing in the same house. He prayed for his released on regular M No.36501 of 2026 -2- he entered the house he noticed that an unknown boy ran out of their room. He did not know the name and address of that boy and when he went inside the room and checked that boy had committed wrong act with his daughter. All her clothes were stained with blood. He asked his daughter who that boy was but his daughter was unable to tell. By the time he went out and checked that the boy had run away from there. He prayed for taking action against the unknown boy who committed wrong act with his daughter and fled away from the spot. He also stated that After registration of criminal case, the victim was medico-legally accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama was arrested. After completion of investigation, challan was presented against the present counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition is in judicial lock up since 21.04.2026. He had not committed the alleged . The allegation against him are wrong. He has been implicated in the present case just because of reason that the mother of the victim got one sale deed executed from him on 19.06.2025 and he had already filed a civil suit bearing No. CS/377/2026 for declaration which is pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Bilaspur, Yamuna so submits that he is noticed in the CCTV footage because he was residing in the same house. He prayed for his released on regular he entered the house he noticed that an unknown boy ran out of their room. He did not know the name and address of that boy and when he went inside the room and checked that boy had committed wrong act with his daughter. All her clothes were stained with blood. He asked his able to tell. By the time he went out and checked that the boy had run away from there. He prayed for taking action against the unknown boy who committed wrong act with his daughter and fled away from the spot. He also stated that legally accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama was arrested. After completion of investigation, challan was presented against the present counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition is in judicial lock up since 21.04.2026. He had not committed the alleged . The allegation against him are wrong. He has been implicated in the mother of the victim got one sale deed executed from him on 19.06.2025 and he had already filed a civil suit bearing No. CS/377/2026 for declaration which is pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Bilaspur, Yamuna so submits that he is noticed in the CCTV footage because he was residing in the same house. He prayed for his released on regular JYOTI 2026.08.27 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 5. Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that rape has been committed up complainant whose date of birth is 12.05.2012. The victim is a specially abled child as she is suffering 75% of permanent disability in relation to her brain as per disability certificate dated 21.07.2022. Taking advance of the condition of the victim, the petitioner brought another boy who committed the penetrative sexual assault upon the victim. dismissal of the present petition. 6. I have head the rival contentions of both the parties. 7. So far as the fact o victim is concerned, the same is proved from her physical condition in which she was found in her own house. The allegations against the petitioner was that he was seen in the CCTV footage installed there called co- was alone and thereby, he connived co the commission of offence of penetrative sexual assault on the victim presumption can be that he had civil litigation with the mother of the victim. The allegations against him are serious of nature and therefore, he is not entitled to be granted concession of regular bail. 8. In view of above discussion a present petition is dismissed. CRM-M No.36501 of 2026 Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that rape has been committed up complainant whose date of birth is 12.05.2012. The victim is a specially abled child as she is suffering 75% of permanent disability in relation to her brain as per disability certificate dated 21.07.2022. Taking advance of e condition of the victim, the petitioner brought another boy who committed the penetrative sexual assault upon the victim. dismissal of the present petition. I have head the rival contentions of both the parties. So far as the fact of commission of penetrative sexual assault upon the victim is concerned, the same is proved from her physical condition in which she was found in her own house. The allegations against the petitioner was that he was seen in the CCTV footage installed there -accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama in the house where the victim was alone and thereby, he connived co-accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama in the commission of offence of penetrative sexual assault on the victim presumption can be raised in favour of the petitioner for the simple reason that he had civil litigation with the mother of the victim. The allegations against him are serious of nature and therefore, he is not entitled to be granted concession of regular bail. In view of above discussion and considering the facts of present case, the present petition is dismissed. M No.36501 of 2026 -3- Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that rape has been committed upon the minor daughter of the complainant whose date of birth is 12.05.2012. The victim is a specially abled child as she is suffering 75% of permanent disability in relation to her brain as per disability certificate dated 21.07.2022. Taking advance of e condition of the victim, the petitioner brought another boy who committed the penetrative sexual assault upon the victim. They prayed for I have head the rival contentions of both the parties. f commission of penetrative sexual assault upon the victim is concerned, the same is proved from her physical condition in which she was found in her own house. The allegations against the petitioner was that he was seen in the CCTV footage installed therein. He accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama in the house where the victim accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama in the commission of offence of penetrative sexual assault on the victim. No the petitioner for the simple reason that he had civil litigation with the mother of the victim. The allegations against him are serious of nature and therefore, he is not entitled to be nd considering the facts of present case, the Learned State counsel assisted by learned counsel for the complainant has on the minor daughter of the complainant whose date of birth is 12.05.2012. The victim is a specially abled child as she is suffering 75% of permanent disability in relation to her brain as per disability certificate dated 21.07.2022. Taking advance of e condition of the victim, the petitioner brought another boy who They prayed for f commission of penetrative sexual assault upon the victim is concerned, the same is proved from her physical condition in which she was found in her own house. The allegations against the in. He accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama in the house where the victim accused Shyam Lal @ Shyama in . No the petitioner for the simple reason that he had civil litigation with the mother of the victim. The allegations against him are serious of nature and therefore, he is not entitled to be nd considering the facts of present case, the JYOTI 2026.08.27 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 9. However, limited for the purpose of present an opinion on the merits of the case 10. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 27.08.2026 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.36501 of 2026 it is clarified that the observations made herein limited for the purpose of present petition an opinion on the merits of the case. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 27.08.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable : M No.36501 of 2026 -4- it is clarified that the observations made hereinabove, are petition and would not be construed as Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (RAMESH KUMARI) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No are and would not be construed as ) JYOTI 2026.08.27 19:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document