Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37030 (PAT)

Bharat Prasad v. Mosmatt Lalo Kuer

C.Misc./898/2025 · 2026-01-06

S B P Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.898 of 2025 ====================================================== 1. Bharat Prasad S/o Ram Dayal Prasad, R/o Marhowrah Khurd, Marhaura, Saran, Marhowrah, P.S. Marhowrah, Dist. Saran 2. Ajay Kumar S/o Late Gautam Prasad, R/o Marhowrah Khurd, Marhaura, Saran, Marhowrah, P.S. Marhowrah, Dist. Saran 3. Mostt Kanti Devi w/o Late Shatrudhan D/O Late Satyanarayan Prasad R/O pakri mohamad, P.O.- Pakri, P.S.- Amnaur, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Mosmatt Lalo Kuer W/o Late -Raghubir Singh @ Dhoori Singh, R/o and P/O- Marhourah, P.S.- Marhourah, Dist.- Saran. 2. Prithvi Raj Singh (Minor) S/o Late Raghubir Singh R/o and P/O- Marhourah, P.S.- Marhourah, Dist.- Saran 3. Asharfi Singh S/o Late Binda Singh R/o P.O. and P.S.- Marhourah, Dist.- Saran 4. Ram Dutt Singh S/o Deo Raj Singh Vill Mauza- Magai, Dist. Pragana- Manghi, P.S.-Chapra Mufassil, P.O. Magaidih Dist. Saran 5. Bachcha Singh S/o Vidya Singh, Mauza and Vill-Masrarkh P.O and P.S- Masrakh, Saran 6. Sunain Devi W/o Durbasa Tiwary H/O Ramchandra Tiwary, Vill-Khargauni, P.O and P.S-Marhaura, Dist. Saran 7. Saryug Singh S/o Isimlalun P.O and P.S-Marhaura, Pragane, Dist. Saran 8. Yogendra Ray S/o Raghunandan Ray, Vill and P.S-Silanrhi, P.S. Marhaura, Dist-Saran 9. Ashok Singh S/o Jagarnath Singh, Vill and PO Rashulpur, P.S-Amnaur, Dist- Saran 10. Ram Dayal Sah S/o Thakur Sah R/O and P.O. and P.S-Marhaura, Dist. Saran 11. Harnath Sah S/o late Takur Sah, R/O, P.O. and P.S.- Marhaura, Distt. Saran. 12. Rameshwar Sah, S/o Deochan Sah R/O Pakri, P.S.- Amnaur, Dist.- Saran. 13. Misri Lal Sah S/o Late Shivgovind Sah R/o, P.O. and P.S. Marhaura. Dist.- Saran. 14. Badami Devi W/o Misri Lal Sah, Mauza and Vill and P.O-Pakari, P.S. Amnaur, Dist. Saran 15. Ram Lagan Sah, S/o Yadu Sah, Vill and P.O and P.S- Marhaura, Saran 16. Chandra Shekhar Singh @ Nema Singh S/o Manan Singh, Vill-P.O and P.S- Marhaura, Dist. Saran 17. Krishna Singh S/o Raghubir Singh @ Dhuri Singh, Resident of Majhaura, Dakkhana, P.S. Majhaura, Distt. Saran. 18. Kamlabati Devi W/o Lalal Singh, D/o Raghubir Singh, Resident of Village - Patna High Court C.Misc. No.898 of 2025(4) dt.06-01-2026 2/3 Dakkhana, P.S. Majhaura, Distt. Saran at present Village and Post Gothana, Majhi, Distt. - Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajkumar Rajesh For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 06-01-2026 In the instant Civil Miscellaneous application, order dated 18.03.2025, passed by learned Sub-Judge, Saran in Title Suit No. 23 of 1981 has been challenged. By the aforesaid impugned order, the report of the learned Survey-knowing Pleader Commissioner in respect of suit properties relating to Plot Nos. 118, 155, 840, 818, 193, 195 and Plot No. 13 of Khata No. 77 has been set aside, and an order has been passed for appointment of a fresh Survey-knowing Pleader Commissioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are defendants before the Trial Court and no objection was ever raised by these petitioners with regard to the aforesaid seven plots earlier, and for the first time such objection has been made against the said order. Learned counsel further submits that the earlier appointed Survey- knowing Pleader Commissioner has since expired, which fact itself necessitates the appointment of another Survey-knowing Pleader Commissioner for proper demarcation and carving out Patna High Court C.Misc. No.898 of 2025(4) dt.06-01-2026 3/3 the respective shares of the parties in the aforesaid plots and to decide the objection made by any party. 3. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court finds no illegality or impropriety in the impugned order, and the same is accordingly upheld. The petitioners shall, however, be at liberty to raise such objections, if so advised, with respect to the subsequent report submitted by the Survey- knowing Pleader Commissioner appointed by the Court. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the instant application stands disposed of. Ankit Kumar/- (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) U