Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37018 (PNJ)

NEHA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/23225/2026 · 2026-09-02

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CWP-23225-2026 & 26056-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110(2) cases Date of Decision: 02.09.2026 1. CWP-23225-2026 Neha and others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents 2. CWP-26056-2026 Sahil Chaudhary and others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present : Mr. Ravinder Singh Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners in both cases. Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Addl. AG Haryana-State. Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondent -HPSC in both cases. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) 1. This order of mine shall dispose of the above-mentioned two writ petitions as they arise from a similar factual matrix. However, for the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from CWP-23225-2026. 2. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the result dated 04.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) declared by respondent No.3-HPSC with respect PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.09.02 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CWP-23225-2026 & 26056-2026 to the post of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) (Computer Science) for Rest of Haryana Cadre and Mewat Cadre, pursuant to advertisement No.23 of 2026 dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-1). Further, it is prayed that respondent No.3-HPSC be directed to conduct the Subject Knowledge Test afresh with complete secrecy and adequate safeguards and, in the alternative, to cause the answer booklets to be evaluated manually and afresh, together with production of the record, disclosure of the marks and cut-offs, an enquiry under the supervision of this Court. 3. Before commencement of further arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeks permission to withdraw both the present civil writ petitions with liberty to inspect the answer sheets pertaining to the petitioner(s) and, in case the grievance still subsists thereafter, to approach this Court for appropriate relief. 4. Upon the aforesaid submission, learned counsel for the respondent- Commission submits that the answer sheets shall be made available for inspection only after an announcement to that effect is made by the Commission. 5. In view of the aforesaid, both the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 6. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 7. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of the connected cases. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 02.09.2026 P.C Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No PUNEET CHAWLA 2026.09.02 16:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document