SRI ANAND KUMAR PRADHAN v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS
WP(C)/533/2026 · 2026-02-08
Soumitra Saikia
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3701 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3701 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010286342025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/533/2026 SRI ANAND KUMAR PRADHAN S/O- LT. BUDDHA SINGH PPRADHAN, R/O- NEW LABARGHANI, PS- CHARDUAR, DIST. SONITPUR (ASSAM), EX-AARMY PERSONNEL NO.
13738341F, EX-HAVILDER 3RD JNK RIFLE VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI, PIN- 110001 2:DIRECTOR GENERAL JAMMU AND KASHMIR RIFLES JABALPUR MADHAYA PRADESH PIN NO. 482001 3:THE COMMANDANT JAMMU AND KASHMIR RIFLES JABALPUR MADHAYA PRADESH PIN NO. 482001 4:THE CHIEF RECORD OFFICE JAMMU AND KASHMIR RIFLES CUM MAJ OIC NE AND PEN GP FOR OIC RECORDS JAK RIF C/O- 56 APO PIN 90877 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R BARUAH, Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.,
Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 09.02
.2026
Mr. R. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B. Chakraborty, learned CGC appearing for the respondents has pointed out that as per Section 3(o) and Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 all service matters pertaining to Armed Forces are to be filed before the Armed Forces Tribunal. The issues raised by the writ petitioner in the present writ petition is non- inclusion of the name of petitioner’s second wife in the pension papers of the writ petitioner. Being aggrieved the present writ petition has been filed. Perusal of the relevant sections of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 reveals that the matter ought to have been filed before the Armed Forces Tribunal. Mr. R. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that he be permitted to withdraw this writ petition and file afresh before the Armed Forces Tribunal. Accordingly, as prayer made, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, permitting the petitioner to approach the Armed Forces Tribunal, Guwahati and pursue his claims accordingly.
JUDGE
Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant