Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 37002 (PNJ)

JAGJIT SINGH @ HARJINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRM-M/49348/2026 · 2026-09-02

To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-49348-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 122 CRM-M-49348-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 02.09.2026 JAGJIT SINGH @ HARJINDER SINGH …. PETITIONER V/S STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS …. RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present : Mr.Ramta Chowdhry, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ritu Raj Singh, DAG, Punjab. **** RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI, J. (Oral) CRM-36340-2026 1. Allowed as prayed for. CRM-M-49348-2026 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at Bar that at this stage, the petitioner shall be contented if a direction is issued to the official respondents to decide representation Annexure P-1 of the petitioner within a time bound schedule. 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only at this stage. 4. Mr. Ritu Raj Singh, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on their behalf and makes a statement at Bar that in view of the limited stand taken today in the Court, he does not intend to file response to the petition in ANJU GOEL 2026.09.02 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-49348-2026 (O&M) -2- question. He also states that the representation Annexure P-1 of the petitioner shall be disposed off in accordance with law within a period of 30 days from today. 5. In view thereof, nothing survives in the present petition. It as well as interim application/s, if any, stand/s disposed off. (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE 02.09.2026 anju Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2026.09.02 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document