NANA ARJUN BANDGAR AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ABA/2393/2026 · 2026-08-24
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3700 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3700 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
81.ABA-2393.26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2393 OF 2026 Nana Arjun Bandgar & Anr. … Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra …. Respondent ______________________ Mr. Padmasinh P. Patil i/by Mr. Siddharth Sutariya, for the Applicants. Mr. Mayur Sonavane, APP for the Respondent-State. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 24 AUGUST 2026 P. C. :-
1. Mr. Padmasinh Patil, learned counsel appearing for the Applicants seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application.
2. Accordingly, Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.08.25 11:12:40 +0530