[2026:RJ-JP:10242] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 502/2026 Jasvindra @ Kalu Son Of Raju @ Raggu @ Raguveer, R/o Hayatpur, Police Station Sikri Presently Residing At Govindgarh, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Santram Son Of Dhansingh, R/o Dhadoli Khurd, Police Station Firozpur, Jhirka, District Nuh, Mewat, Haryana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Mr. Kapil Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Abhishek Garg, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/03/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 19.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sikri, District Deeg, by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under Sections 302, 201 and 120-B IPC and he has been summoned through arrest warrant. 2. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner approached the Revisional Court i.e. learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nagar, District Deeg by way of filing a revision petition, however, the same was also rejected vide order dated 15.01.2026 and the order passed by the learned Magistrate has been upheld. [2026:RJ-JP:10242] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-502/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after thorough investigation in the matter, police has submitted negative final report, but the reasons assigned in the final report have not been considered and on the basis of the evidence of the complainant and other witnesses, now the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the above stated offences. 4. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this petition on merits and he has made a prayer for converting the arrest warrant into bailable warrant. 5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant-respondent opposed the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submitted that a prima facie case is made out against all the accused persons as per the evidence and documents available on the record, hence the Court below has not committed any error not only in taking cognizance against the petitioner for the above stated offences, but also by summoning him through arrest warrant, hence interference of this Court is not warranted. 6. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar and perused the material available on the record. 7. Considering the fact that the petitioner has not pressed this petition on merits, but has confined his prayer to the extent of converting arrest warrant into bailable warrant and looking to the fact that after thorough investigation in the matter, the police has not found involvement of the petitioner and submitted negative final report and no specific overt-act has been assigned to the petitioner and considering the overall facts and circumstances of [2026:RJ-JP:10242] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-502/2026] the case, the Trial Court is directed to recall the arrest warrant issued against the petitioner and summon him through bailable warrant. 8. In case, the petitioner appears before the Trial Court on or before 27.03.2026, he be released on bail subject to furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. 9. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant Criminal Misc. Petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /57