SUMAN BARMAN @ SUMAL BARMAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/2793/2026 · 2026-08-28
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36992 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36992 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
28.08.2026 Court No.35. D/L.67. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (A) 2793 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Hili Police Station case no. 170 of 2025 dated 26.08.2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A/28 of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Suman Barman @ Sumal Barman.
……Petitioner. Mr. Sujan Chatterjee Mr. Rohan Bavishi
......for the Petitioner. Mr. Ajay Roy Mr. Radheyshyam Tiwari
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been foisted with a criminal case and has come to know regarding the incident after there was an issue relating to search of the present petitioner. It has been informed that warrant, proclamation and attachment has been issued against the petitioner. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Report submitted by the State do not reflect any previous antecedents, CDR or money trail connections so far as the present petitioner is concerned with the other accused persons. Having regard to the materials present against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner namely, Suman Barman @ Sumal Barman is allowed. As such, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and
2 conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Since, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court this order of anticipatory bail of petitioner shall remain in force for a period of six weeks from date. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 2793 of 2026 is allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)