- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010401922026 NC: 2026:KHC:45639 MFA No. 4382 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4382 OF 2026 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. UMA IYER D/O. LATE N.S. ANANTHA IYER AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT FLAT NO.101 "PURVA HEIGHTS" BILEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD NEAR MEENAKSHI TEMPLE BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 076. …APPELLANT (BY SRI PRAKASH T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI T. SHANTHARAJU S/O. LATE T. DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.42 3RD MAIN ROAD JAYANAGAR 7TH BLOCK BENGALURU - 560 082. 2. SMT. P. LAKSHMI W/O. SRI T. SHANTHARAJU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.42 3RD MAIN ROAD JAYANAGAR 7TH BLOCK BENGALURU - 560 082. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010401922026 NC: 2026:KHC:45639 MFA No. 4382 of 2026 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MANASA B. RAO, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 AND R2; SRI PRAKASH M. GANIGER, HCGP FOR R3 TO R5) THIS MFA FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) OF CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 02.04.2026 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN O.S.NO.2035/2014 BY IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant and learned counsel for respondents are present. 2. Registry has raised objection regarding the maintainability of the present appeal on the ground that the subject value of the appeal is less than `10,00,000/-, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010401922026 NC: 2026:KHC:45639 MFA No. 4382 of 2026 in view of Section 19(1) of the Karnataka Civil Courts Act, 1964. 3. The objection raised by Registry is sustained. Consequently, the appeal is held to be not maintainable. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. 4. Liberty is reserved to the appellant to file such proceedings as may be permissible in law before the appropriate Forum. 5. The time spent in agitating the matter before this Court, shall be excluded in accordance with the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963. 6. Registry shall return the certified copies to the learned counsel for appellant. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10