Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36986 (KAR)

SMT. CHANDRAVATHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/24955/2026 · 2026-08-18

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010548912026 NC: 2026:KHC:44252 WP No. 24955 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.24955 OF 2026 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHANDRAVATHI W/O LATE GOPALA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT. KOTEGUDDE MANE, PAMBETHADY VILLAGE AND POST, SULLIA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574232. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADITHYA G ACHARYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001 REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMITTEE FOR UNAUTHORISED OCCUPATION THE OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, SULLIA TALUK - 574239 REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010548912026 NC: 2026:KHC:44252 WP No. 24955 of 2026 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575 001. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER THE OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PUTTUR TALUK, PUTTUR - 574 201. 5. THE TAHSILDAR THE OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR, SULLIA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 239. 6. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT KALLADKA, PAMBETHADY, SULLIA - 574232. 7. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT OFFICE OF THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT KALLADKA, PAMBETHADY, SULLIA - 574232. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010548912026 NC: 2026:KHC:44252 WP No. 24955 of 2026 QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.10.2017 PASSED IN NO. N.C.R.S.R.44/98-99 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-H;AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel sought leave of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to approach the competent authority. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority, the Writ Petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25