Raghvendra Kumar v. The State of Bihar through Collector, Jehanabad
MA/513/2024 · 2026-01-30
Rajiv Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36985 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36985 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.513 of 2024 ======================================================
1. Raghvendra Kumar Son of Late Kumar Birendra Sharma, Resident of Village Okari, Police Station - Ghosi, Post Office - Jaitipur, District - Jehanabad.
2. Om Prakash Sharma Son of Late Laxmi Narayan Singh @ Laxmi Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Okari, Police Station - Ghosi, Post Office - Jaitipur, District - Jehanabad. ... ... Appellant/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Collector, Jehanabad Post Office and Police Station - Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad.
2. The Director, Co-operative Officer, Jehanabad.
3. The Circle Officer, Modanganj, Post Office - Modanganj, Police Station - Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad.
4. Rinki Devi, Wife of Bibhuti Sharma, Mukhiya, Okari Panchayat, Resident of Village- Okari, Police Station - Ghoshi, District - Jehanabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Uday Shankar Sharan Singh, GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 30-01-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
“for setting aside the order dated 09.04.2024, passed by the Civil Judge, (Senior Division-1), Jehanabad in Title Suit No. 90 of 2022 whereby the application dated 10.01.2023 filed by the appellants under Order 39 Rule and 2 read with Section 94 and 151 of the Code of Civil
Patna High Court MA No.513 of 2024(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 Procedure and the same was rejected by Civil Judge (Senior Division-I), Jehanabad.”
3. Learned counsel for the appellants prays for withdrawal of the petition.
4. Permission accorded.
5. Accordingly, the present appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U