1 CGHC010164232023 2026:CGHC:41897 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 959 of 2023 Chanki Ramwani S/o Shri Mukesh Ramwani Aged About 33 Years R/o House No. 33 Years, R/o House No. 17/641, Nahar Para, Station Road, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Registered Owner Of Vehicle No. C.G.-04-ZC-1082) ... Appellant versus 1 - Tulsi Sahu W/o Bodhan Sahu Aged About 54 Years R/o Vijay Nagar, Near Railway Track, Ward No. 04, Bhanpuri, P.S. Khamtarai, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Bodhan Sahu S/o Late Anand Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Vijay Nagar, Near Railway Track, Ward No. 04, Bhanpuri, P.S. Khamtarai, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Guddu Rajput S/o Bahadur Rajput Aged About 45 Years R/o Paras Nagar, Near Shiv Mandir, Devendra Nagar, P.S. Devendra Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Vehicle No. C.G.04 ZC 1082) 4 - Sunil Agrawal S/o Late Satyanarayan Agrawal Aged About 48 Years R/o Address No.1, Sunil Road Lines, Near Ram Mandir, Krishi Upaj Mandi, Pandri, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Present Residing At Address No. 2 Vishal Nagar, Telibandha, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Possessory Owner Of Vehicle No. C.G. 04-2C-1082) ... Respondent(s) BHOLA NATH KHATAI Digitally signed by BHOLA NATH KHATAI Date: 2026.09.26 16:20:47 +0530 2 For Appellant : Mr. Swayam Tehanguria Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Prabhat Saxena, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (26.09.2026) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the owner under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the award daded 06.03.2023 passed by the 9th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur (C.G.) in Claim Case No.722/2018, whereby a total sum of 13,00,360/- has been awarded to the ₹ claimants on account of the death of Mukesh @ Golu Sahu, who succumbed to the injuries sustained in the motor vehicle accident that occurred on 22.01.2018. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant-owner submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled before the learned Tribunal in the Lok Adalat held on 12.09.2026. He, therefore, submits that the appellant does not wish to press the present appeal and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 3. Learned counsel appearing for respondents No.1 and 2 has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant. 4. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Khatai