Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36980 (PNJ)

SUDERSHNA DEVI AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

RFA/983/2026 · 2026-08-27

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

267-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** RFA-983-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 Sudershna Devi and Another ...Appellants Versus Punjab State and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punjab. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) CM-2504-CI-2026 1. The applicants through instant application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 are seeking condonation of delay of 02 days in filing the appeal. 2. Learned State counsel submits that in view of period of delay, he has no objection if delay in filing instant appeal is condoned. 3. In the wake of aforesaid statement, application for condonation of delay is allowed and delay in filing enclosed appeal is hereby condoned. CM-2503-CI-2026 1. The applicants through instant application are seeking condonation of delay of 9784 days in re-filing the appeal. 2. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection if delay in re-filing the instant appeal is condoned subject to condition that applicant may not be granted interest for the delayed period. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants agrees to the aforesaid statement. PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.09.03 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RFA-983-2026 (O&M) -2- 4. In the wake of aforesaid statement, delay in re-filing enclosed appeal is hereby condoned subject to the condition that applicants would not be entitled to interest for the delayed period. MAIN CASE 1. The appellants through instant appeal under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 are seeking modification of award dated 01.04.1999 whereby learned Additional District Judge, Gurdaspur did not award claimed amount of compensation. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that issue involved herein is squarely covered by order dated 02.11.2018 passed by this Court in RFA-1006-2010. 3. On being asked, learned State counsel concedes that appellant’s claim is squarely covered by aforesaid order. 4. The appeal is hereby allowed in terms of order dated 02.11.2018 passed by this Court in RFA-1006-2010. It is made clear that as conceded by learned counsel for the appellants, the appellants shall not be entitled to interest for the period of delay in re-filing the appeal (9784 days). 5. Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 27.08.2026 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.09.03 11:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document