Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Gujarat · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3698 (GUJ)

GOVINDBHAI DAYALBHAI PARMAR v. STATE OF GUJARAT

CR.MA/22379/2026 · 2026-09-24

Hasmukh D Suthar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

R/CR.MA/22379/2026(GJHC240724822026) ORDER DATED: 24/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 22379 of 2026 ========================================================== GOVINDBHAI DAYALBHAI PARMAR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT ========================================================== Appearance: K T BELADIYA(9101) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MS JYOTI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR Date : 24/09/2026 ORDER [1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State. [2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11198059260322 of 2026 registered with Umrala Police Station, Bhavnagar, for the offence under Sections under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. [3.0] Learned advocate for the applicant has submitted that the present applicant has been falsely implicated in the offence. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions. [4.0] Learned APP vehemently opposed the present application and submitted that he is involved in the offence. Hence, he has requested to dismiss the present application for regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence. [5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be R/CR.MA/22379/2026(GJHC240724822026) ORDER DATED: 24/09/2026 taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the State and similar other considerations are required to be considered. [6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the investigation papers. In present case, the investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. Following aspects have been considered: 1. substantial part of investigation is over; 2. The applicant was arrested on 14.08.2026; 3. applicant is having one past antecedent; 4. commencement and conclusion of trial will take its own time; 5. None of the offence alleged is punishable with life sentence or death penalty; 6. It is alleged that IMFL was found from the residential premises of the present applicant; 7. Now nothing is required to be recovered and discovered from the accused; [7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated R/CR.MA/22379/2026(GJHC240724822026) ORDER DATED: 24/09/2026 principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration. [8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11198059260322 of 2026 registered with Umrala Police Station, Bhavnagar, on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty- five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall; (a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police; (c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week; (d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned; (e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once a month till charge-sheet is filed between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.; (f) furnish the UIDAI Number, Contact Number/s, Passport Number (if he is having the passport), E-mail address and present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence and contact Number without prior permission of Trial Court; (g) not indulge in similar type of activities, if the applicant is found to R/CR.MA/22379/2026(GJHC240724822026) ORDER DATED: 24/09/2026 be indulged in any illegal activities in future, the trial Court concerned will be free to issue warrant and cancel the bail granted to the applicant; [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted. (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J) KUMAR ALOK Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: ALOK KUMAR(HC01091), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 24/09/2026 17:38:34