Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36970 (CHH)

VEER SIKANDAR KHUNTE (MINOR) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4402/2026 · 2026-09-20

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010331602026 2026:CGHC:40955 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4402 of 2026 1 - Veer Sikandar Khunte (Minor) S/o Sikandar Singh Khunte Aged About 14 Years Through Its Father Sikandar Singh Khunte S/o Mehettar Lal Khunte, Aged 47 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Bade Seepat, Tahsil Malkharouda, District- Sakti (C.G.) 2 - Sidhhant Lahre (Minor) S/o Kamal Kishore Lahre Aged About 14 Years Through Father Kamal Kishore Lahre S/o Puri Ram Lahre, Aged 40 Years, R/o Village Dewarghata, Tahsil Hashod, District - Sakti (C.G.) 3 - Kishnan Sharma S/o Lalit Narayan Sharma Aged About 14 Years Through Father Lalit Narayan Sharma S/o Radheshyam Sharma, Aged 50 Years, R/o Village Shivrinarayan District - Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.) 3 - District Education Officer Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.) 4 - P.M. Shri School Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Sakti, Through Its Principal, Village Chisda, Post Pendri Via Birra, Sakti District - Sakti (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No. 1, 2, 3 For Respondent No. 4 : : Mr. Anway Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI alongwith Ms. Shweta Rai, CGC Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 21/09/2026 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying for the following reliefs: “10.1 The Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue direction to the respondents to cancel the suspension of the petitioners and permit the petitioners to rejoin the respondent no. 4 school. 10.2 Any other consequential relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper and for which the petitioners is entitled, may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 2. This Court, vide order dated 03.09.2026, directed the concerned authorities to file their reply expeditiously with regard to the transfer of the petitioners to a nearby Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (JNV). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Commissioner, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Regional 3 Office, Bhubaneswar (Odisha), has transferred the petitioners to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas situated at different places. 4. Heard. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that all three petitioners have been transferred to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas situated at different places, the grievance raised in the present petition no longer survives. Accordingly, the subject matter of the petition has been rendered infructuous. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Madhurima