IMTIAZ AHMED v. UNION TERROITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH COMMSSR / SECY HOME DEPTT AND ORS
CRM(M)/299/2023 · 2026-10-07
Shahzad Azeem
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3697 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3697 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No.299/2023
Imtiaz Ahmed
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
UT of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Bhanu Jasrotia, GA.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER 07.10.2026
There had been no representation on behalf of the petitioner on last two dates of hearing. Today is also the same position. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecution of the matter.
Accordingly, this petition is, dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Shahzad Azeem)
Judge
Jammu 07.10.2026 Surinder
Sr. No. 68 Surinder Kumar 2026.10.07 18:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document