CAPRI GLOBAL CAPITAL LIMITED, v. CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS RAIPUR,
WPC/2064/2024 · 2026-04-05
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3697 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3697 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:15441
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2064 of 2024 1 - Capri Global Capital Limited, Registered Office Address- 502 Tower A Peninsula Business Park Senapati Bapat Marg Lower Parel Mumbai Mh 400013 Branch Office At- Shop No. 205, 2nd Floor, Lal Ganga Business Park, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Pin- 492001, Represented By Its Authorised Officer- Mr. Ankush Vishwakarma Aged About 32 Yrs, S/o Shri Jitendra Vishwakarma, Occupation- Service, Address- Capri Global Capital Limited Branch Office At- Ground Floor, Jagat Tower, Near Wisdom Valley School, Behind Sbi Narmada Road, Hawabagh College Road, Gorakhpur, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh.- 482001.
... Petitioner versus 1 - Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Kumkum Chhatri Alias Anjali Chhatri W/o Shri Sunil Kumar Chhatri Address- Mig-8, Ekta Vihar, Mahaveer Nagar, New Puraina, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Pin- 492001. 3 - Shri Sunil Kumar Chhatri S/o Shri D.M. Chhatri Address- Mig-8, Ekta Vihar, Mahaveer Nagar, New Puraina, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Pin- 492001. 4 - M/s Unique Boutique Through The Proprietor Smt. Kumkum Chhatri W/o Shri Amarnath Arora, Address- Near Shiv Mandir, Shaint Kanwar Ram Chowk Katora Talab, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Pin- 402001.
... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS) For Petitioner For State : : Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocate Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Adv. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.04.06 18:01:05 +0530
2 Order on Board 06/04/2026
1. Heard.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, as the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur, has passed an order in respect of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Hence, the present petition has become infructuous.
3. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar