SRIMANTA SANA AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/25614/2025 · 2026-02-25
Suvra Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3697 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3697 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
February 25, 2026 (35) ARDR WPA 25614 of 2025
Srimanta Sana & anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & ors.
Adv. Sayan Banerjee, Adv. Suparna Dutta, …for the petitioners. Adv. Subir Pal, …for the State.
Affidavit of service filed by the petitioners and the report submitted by the State are taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that theft of gold ornaments valued at Rs.14 lakhs approximately occurred in the house of the petitioners. Though FIR was registered pursuant to the complaint lodged by the 1st petitioner, no recovery has been made as yet. It appears from the report submitted by the State that pursuant to the complaint lodged by the petitioner specific case was registered and investigation held. Two accused persons were arrested and several gold ornaments recovered from their possession. Notice under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was issued upon the petitioners requesting them to produce the documents in support of their claim over the recovered ornaments. The petitioners did not turn up. Charge sheet has been submitted upon completion of investigation. The petitioners seek to take necessary steps before the learned Magistrate, if required.
2 Nothing further remains to be dealt with in the writ petition. The same is accordingly disposed of. There shall however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)