ABDUL GANI ITOO AND ORS. v. FAYAZ AHMAD SHERGOJIRI AND ORS.
CR/12/2024 · 2026-10-06
Rajnesh Oswal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3695 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3695 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(2358/2024) IN CR 12/2024 ABDUL GANI ITOO AND ORS. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs.
FAYAZ AHMAD SHERGOJIRI AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: None. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
O R D E R 06.10.2026
1. In terms of order dated 15.12.2025, the petitioners had sought time to bring on record the legal representative of deceased respondent No.2.
2. Needful has not been done, so much so, none has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioners on two consecutive dates of hearing. Same is the position today as well.
3. In view of above, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 06.10.2026 Ishaq
Isaq Hameed Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 09.10.26