Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36940 (PNJ)

RASHMI SHARMA v. ANURAG RASTOGI IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/2365/2026 · 2026-08-26

Vikas Suri

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 COCP-2365-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.08.2026 Rashmi Sharma ...Petitioner Versus Anurag Rastogi and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Sween Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Praveen Kumar, DAG, Haryana. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Writ Court in CWP-34663-2025 and connected matters. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present petition, the aforesaid order has since been complied with and the petitioner has been given appointment notionally with effect from the date on which the other candidates pursuant to the advertisement in question, were appointed. 3. In view of the above, he submits that the grievance does not survive and therefore, he prays that the present petition be disposed of as SUMIT KUMAR 2026.08.27 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-2365-2026 (O&M) -2- not pressed any further. 4. Disposed of as not pressed. 5. Rule stands discharged. (VIKAS SURI) August 26, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.08.27 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment