1 CGHC010267282026 2026:CGHC:41702-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 698 of 2026 1 - Kunti Singh W/o Late Vijay Singh, Aged About 54 Years R/o Bandhawapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Rajendra Singh S/o Late Vijay Singh Aged About 36 Years R/o Bandhawapara, Sarkanda, Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Kamla Singh (Died And Deleted) Nil 2 - Durga Singh W/o Late Gyan Singh, Aged About 56 Years R/o Ashok Nagar, Bilaspur Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Sharda Singh W/o Late Ajay Singh, Aged About 39 Years R/o Sundar Nagar, Raipur Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Vanshika D/o Late Ajay Singh Aged About 15 Years Minors Through Their Mothers Sharda Singh W/o Late Ajay Singh R/o Sundar Nagar, Raipur Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Anmol Singh S/o Late Ajay Singh, Aged About 14 Years Minors Through Their Mothers Sharda Singh W/o Late Ajay Singh R/o Sundar Nagar, Raipur Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 6 - Usha Singh D/o Late Man Singh W/o Lalmani Singh, Aged About 20 Years R/o Sundar Nagar, Raipur Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 7 - Uma Ayyar D/o Late Man Singh Aged About 45 Years R/o Sumangal Apartment Phase -1, 13 -Block, Quarter No.302, Link Road, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 8 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 9 - Sardar Gurmit Singh Bhatia S/o Late Sardar Harvansh Singh Bhatia Aged About 52 Years Main Road Dayalband, Bilaspur Tehsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.), PRAKASH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRAKASH KUMAR Date: 2026.09.25 15:24:40 +0530 2 ... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Neela Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.8 /State : Mr. Anand Gupta, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput, Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25.09.2026 1. Heard on I.A. No.1/2026, an application for condonation of delay in filing the instant MCC. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 57 days in filing the MCC is hereby condoned. 3. This MCC has been filed for restoration of F.A. No. 45/2024 which was dismissed on account of peremptory order passed by this Court on 09.04.2026. 4. The present MCC is not opposed by learned counsel for the State. 5. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, it is allowed and F.A. No. 45/2024 is directed to be restored to its original number. 6. Accordingly, the present MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sachin Singh Rajput) (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge Prakash