Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36937 (CAL)

SK AHAMMAD HOSSEN v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/14054/2026 · 2026-08-31

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31.08.2026 Court No.25 D/L No.241 S. Gayen In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 14054 of 2026 Sk Ahammad Hossen Versus The Election Commission of India & Ors. Mr. Santanu Maji Mr. Subhayu Das Ms. Debrani Mondal …for the Petitioner Ms. Anamika Pandey …for the ECI 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the present writ application, the Appellate Tribunal has taken up the matter on June 23, 2026 without any notice to the petitioner and without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, the learned Tribunal has excluded the name of the petitioner from the e-roll. He prays for a direction upon the Appellate Tribunal to restore the appeal preferred by the petitioner and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner to dispose of the appeal as early as possible. 2. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to restore and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner after giving an opportunity of hearing as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 3. Accordingly, WPA 14054 of 2026 stands disposed of. 2 4. Urgent certified Photostat copy, if applied for, be given to the parties after compliance with all requisite formalities. (Krishna Rao, J.)