1 CGHC010006842007 2026:CGHC:41849 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 9 of 2007 1 - Lakshmi Bai (Died And Deleted Through LRs ) In Compliance Of Honble Court Order Dated 19-09-2022 1.1-A. Khemchand Jain, S/o. Late Surajmal Jain, Aged About 83 Years, R/o. Banya Para, Main Road, Dhamtari, Tehsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 1.2-B. Smt. Sandhya Jain, D/o. Khemchand Jain, Aged About 56 Years, W/o. Premchand Jain, R/o. Banya Para, Main Road, Dhamtari, Tehsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 1.3-C. Smt. Ritu Jain, D/o. Khemchand Jain, Aged About 50 Years, W/o. Kailashchand Jain, R/o. Banya Para, Main Road, Dhamtari, Tehsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 1.4-D. Smt. Meena Jain, D/o. Khemchand Jain, Aged About 47 Years, W/o. Late Goutamchand Jain, R/o. Banya Para, Main Road, Dhamtari, Tehsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 1.5-E. Smt. Lata Jain, D/o. Khemchand Jain, Aged About 45 Years, W/o. ASHOK SAHU Digitally signed by ASHOK SAHU Date: 2026.09.26 14:05:45 +0530 2 Kantilal Jain, R/o. Banya Para, Main Road, Dhamtari, Tehsil And District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 1.6-F. Surendra Jain, S/o. Khemchand Jain, Aged About 53 Years, R/o. Banya Para, Main Road, Dhamtari, Tehsil And District Dhamtari,,,,,, Chhattisgarh ... Appellants versus 1 - Ishwarchand Dewangan, S/o. Manguram Dewangan, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Village Achhota, Tahsil Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 3 – Gayachand, S/o. Jhumarlal Jain (Sancheti) Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Narharpur, Tahsil Narharpur, District Kanker, Chhattisgarh 4 - Rameshwar Prasad Sahu, S/o. Gopal Prasad Sahu, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Ward Danitola, Tahsil Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Appellants : None appeared. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. R.S.Patel, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Md. Shahid Raza, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate (Single Bench) Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sushma Sawant Order on Board 3 25.09.2026 1. This first appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment & decree dated 09/12.05.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Dhamtari in Civil Suit No.23-A/2004. 2. Even in the second round of hearing, none appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellants; therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sushma Sawant) Judge Ashok