HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17581 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is despite there being an injunction order passed by the Trial Court in Suit No.974 of 2025 against the respondent nos.5 to 14, the respondent nos.5 to 14 are not abiding by the injunction order. 3. If that be so, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to file an application under Order 39 Rule-2A of C.P.C. and the writ petition is not an appropriate remedy. 4. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid liberty. May 6, 2026 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Sunder Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Pradeep Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 13 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad