28/01 2026 AD-08/24 266312 NANDY (DISMISSED) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 1191 of 2026 RUPA SINHA Vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Tarapada De, Advocate Mr. Mahadeb Khan, Advocate …...for the Petitioner Mr. Sadhan Kr. Halder, Advocate Ms. Sanjukta Samanta, Advocate ……for the State Ms. Tapati Samanta, Advocate ……for the Respondent No. 4 1. At the time of hearing Ms. Samanta, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent no. 4, submits that the representation of the petitioner dated 15.12.2025, seeking benefits of family pension on account of her father, a librarian who expired on 10.04.1978, has been rejected on 15.01.2026. 2. A copy of the order dated 15.01.2026, as produced, be kept with the record. 3. In view of such order, rejecting the petitioner’s representation, the writ-petition has become infructuous and accordingly WPA 1191 of 2026 is dismissed. 4. The petitioner will have the liberty to challenge the order of 15.01.2026, if so advised. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2