Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36918 (PNJ)

DARSHAN SINGH v. UNION BANK OF INDIA

RA-CW/474/2026 · 2026-08-27

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RA-CW-474-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Item No.120 CM-14780-CWP-2026 IN/AND RA-CW-474-2026 IN CWP-14709-2020 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 Darshan …Applicant Versus Union Bank of India …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Sunny K. Singla, Advocate for the applicant Mr. Ajay Singh Rana, Advocate for the respondent *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The applicant through instant application is seeking review/recalling of order dated 18.12.2023 passed by this Court in the captioned petition. 2. The applicant is seeking review of order dated 18.12.2023 on the basis of subsequent judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo v. Union of India and others, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3826. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that order dated 18.12.2023 may be reviewed in terms of order in Jaggo (supra). 4. As held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Govt. of NCT of Delhi through the Secretary, Land and Building Department v. M/s K.L. Rathi Steels Limited, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 288, order cannot be reviewed on the basis of subsequent order of Supreme Court or same Court. MOHIT KUMAR 2026.08.27 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RA-CW-474-2026 (O&M) -2- 5. In the backdrop, the review application deserves to be dismissed and accordingly dismissed. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 27.08.2026 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2026.08.27 15:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.