Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36912 (KAR)

SRI. V. MUNIKRISHANAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/10355/2016 · 2026-08-27

R Nataraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010034112016 NC: 2026:KHC:46298 WP No. 10355 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 10355 OF 2016 (LA-BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. V. MUNIKRISHANAPPA S/O. LATE M. VENKATAGIRIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 2. SMT. PUTTAMMA D/O. LATE M. VENKATAGIRIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 3. SRI. VENKATESHAPPA S/O. LATE M. VENKATAGIRIYAPPA, SINCE DECEASED BY LRS, 3(a) SMT. LAKSHAMMA, W/O. LATE V. VENKATESHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 4. SRI. VAJRAPPA S/O. LATE M. VENKATAGIRIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT MANOVARTHE KAVALU VILLAGE, UTTARHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT-560 008. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VISHWANATH H.M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010034112016 NC: 2026:KHC:46298 WP No. 10355 of 2016 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER 3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. MUKUND PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE SCHEME BANASHANKARI 6TH STAGE, BANGALORE ENVISAGED UNDER PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION NO.BDA/SLAO/A4PR/194/2002-03 DATED 07.11.2002 AT ANNEXURE-C ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AND THE FINAL NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.UDD/750/MNX/2003 DATED 09.09.2003 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ANNEXURE-D SO FAR AS THE PETITIONERS SCHEDULE PROPERTY APPLYING THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 27 OF BDA ACT BE DECLARED AS LAPSED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010034112016 NC: 2026:KHC:46298 WP No. 10355 of 2016 ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners. 2. Even on the last two occasions, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1