SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/40703/2026 · 2026-09-03
Virinder Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36907 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 36907 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
280 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-40703-2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 SANDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the petitioners. Ms. Navreet Kaur, AAG, Punjab.
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J.
(Oral)
1. On 24.07.2026, when the matter was listed for hearing, the same was ajdourned for today, i.e., 03.09.2026 as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners even today despite second call. It can be safely presumed that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present petition. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the instant petition on the docket, indefinitely.
2. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 03.09.2026 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2026.09.03 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh