KULDEEP SINGH DHINWA S/O SHRI BANWARI LAL DHINWA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4721/2026 · 2026-03-17
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 369 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 369 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11309] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4721/2026 Kuldeep Singh Dhinwa S/o Shri Banwari Lal Dhinwa, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Sounthaly, Post Titanwar, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. Presently Posted As Phc Bugala, Block Nawalgarh, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Medical Health And Family Welfare, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 302005.
2. The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical And Health Services Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) 302005.
3. The Addl. Director, Medical And Health Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, (Raj.)-
302005.
4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad with Mr. Illyas Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 17/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submitted that the petitioner although actually appointed on 08.02.2017, despite his selection on merits, the appointment
order was issued on 10.02.2016. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for notional benefits from the date of issuance of initial appointment order.
[2026:RJ-JP:11309] (2 of 2) [CW-4721/2026]
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the controversy in this regard has already been set at rest vide
order dated 21.11.2017 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21214/2017 (Om Prakash & Ors Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied, in case he is granted liberty to submit a representation before the respondents for addressing his grievances.
4. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to submit representation before the competent authority, who shall consider and decide the representation by a speaking order strictly in accordance with law within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J RINCHU/13