Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36892 (KAR)

Y V ANNAIAH v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/7136/2026 · 2026-08-19

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010156302026 NC: 2026:KHC:44549 WP NO.7136 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.7136 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: Y.V. ANNAIAH S/O LATE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS, R/AT NO.4, Y.V. ANNAIAH ROAD, YELACHENAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAGHU PRAKASH BABU D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTILCES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2-TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER DATED 27TH JANUARY, 2015 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1- Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010156302026 NC: 2026:KHC:44549 WP NO.7136 OF 2026 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB- DIVISION, BENGALURU IN CASE NO.RA(S)25/2009-10 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO MAKE ENTRIES IN PURSUANCE OF THE LAND TRIBUNAL ORDER; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Spoorthy Hegde, learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.2-Tahsildar to implement the order dated 27th January, 2015 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.1 in Case No.RA(S)25/2009-10 for making entries in the revenue records in respect of subject land in terms of order passed by the Land Tribunal. 3. Heard Sri. Raghu Prakash Babu D., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010156302026 NC: 2026:KHC:44549 WP NO.7136 OF 2026 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, on careful perusal of the writ papers, it is forthcoming that the respondent No.1-Assistant Commissioner, by order dated 27th January, 2015 (Annexure-A) in Case No.RA(S)25/2009-10 had directed the respondent No.2- Tahsildar to verify the final orders passed by the Land Tribunal and the mutation No.119/2004-05 in accordance with law and pass suitable orders. In this regard, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner made available the proceedings pending in R.R.T/C.R.(Dispute)/24/2015-16, which makes it clear that, no decision has been taken by the respondent No.2. Therefore, the respondent No.2-Tahsilder is directed to conclude the aforementioned RRT proceedings in accordance with law, within an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12