1 CGHC010249212017 2026:CGHC:41585 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Criminal Revision No.239 of 2017 1 - Jainul Abedin, S/o Shri Abdul Aziz Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Bidhua Police Station Dawat, District Rohtas, Bihar. 2 - Hamid Ansari S/o Shri Hazi Sattar Ansari Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Bidhua Police Station Dawat, District Rohtas, Bihar. 3 - Smt. Shamusun Nisha W/o Shri Jainul Abedin Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Bidhua Police Station Dawat, District Rohtas, Bihar. 4 - Salim Mansoori S/o Shri Shobrati Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Bidhua Police Station Dawat, District Rohtas, Bihar. 5 - Mir Irshad S/o Shri Mir Shadik Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Bidhua Police Station Dawat, District Rohtas, Bihar 6 - Tamanna Khatoon W/o Tipu Sultan Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Bidhua Police Station Dawat, District Rohtas, Bihar. ... Applicants versus SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Digitally signed by SISTLA NEELIMA VISHNU PRIYA Date: 2026.09.25 11:07:43 +0530 2 1 - Tipu Sultan, S/o Qayum Ansari Aged About 26 Years R/o Atal Avas, Muktipara Police Station Gandhinagar, Ambikapur District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chunnu Miya, S/o not known (as mentioned in revision memo) R/o Village Bidhua Police Station Dawat, District Rohtas, Bihar. 3 - Salim Ansari S/o Not Known (as mentioned in revision memo) Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gazipur Khas Uttar Pradesh. ... Non-Applicants For Applicants : None. For Non-Applicants : None. Hon'ble Shri Sudhir Kumar , Judge Order on Board 24.09.2026 1. The present Criminal Revision has been preferred against the order dated 26.11.2016 passed by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) in Criminal Revision No.73/2016, arising out of the order dated 05.08.2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambikapur in the complaint case filed by the Revisionists against the Non-applicants, whereby the learned Sessions Court, noticing that the complaint case had not been registered by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, directed registration of the same and returned the matter to the concerned Court for registration thereof. 3 2. None appeared nor any representation is made on behalf of the parties even when the case is called in the second round of hearing. 3. In view of above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the Revision for non-prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the instant Revision is dismissed for non- prosecution. 5. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned Court for necessary information. Sd/- (Sudhir Kumar) Judge Priya