SRI. SRIPATHI RAO NADIGAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/23956/2024 · 2026-04-16
S R Krishna Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3689 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3689 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20682 WP No. 23956 of 2024 C/W WP No. 25757 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 23956 OF 2024 (S-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 25757 OF 2023 (S-RES) IN WP No. 23956/2024
BETWEEN:
SRI. SRIPATHI RAO NADIGAR S/O LATE RANGANATH RAO NADIGAR, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHAKUNAHALLI, JADEHOBLI, SORABA TALUK, SIMOGA DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M. S. CHANDRASHEKAR BABU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SORABA TALUK, SHIMOGA DISTRICT.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR, SORAB TALUK, S ORAB DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH NAIK, AGA)
Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20682 WP No. 23956 of 2024 C/W WP No. 25757 of 2023
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO RELEASE INTEREST OF 12% PER ANNUM ON PENSION AS
ORDER IN WP 478/80/2018 C/W 50532/2021 DTD 14.07.2021 AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND ALSO IN THE LIGHT OF DIVISION BENCH
ORDER PASSED SUPRA.
IN WP NO. 25757/2023
BETWEEN:
1.
VENKOBA RAO K., AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT NO.90/100/568, 1ST MAIN, 4TH CROSS ROAD, DAVANAGERE – 577 004
2.
K. PADMAVATHI W/O GURUNATH RAO, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, BRAHMA COLONY, UJJANI DURGA, HARAPPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, DAVANAGERE – 577 004
3.
SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O LATE K. H. HONNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, MADABALAHALLI, KOTAGARAHALLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M. S. CHANDRASHEKAR BABU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE DISTRICT, DAVANAGERE – 577 004
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20682 WP No. 23956 of 2024 C/W WP No. 25757 of 2023
3.
THE TAHASILDAR HARAPPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT – 577 004 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH NAIK, AGA)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO RELEASE INTEREST OF 12% PER ANNUM ON PENSION AS ORDERED IN WP 478-80/2018 C/W 11510/2018 DATED 06/10/2020 IN THE LIGHT OF DIVISION BENCH ORDER IN ANNEXURE-M AND ALSO AS PER ORDERS IN WP 39634/04 DECIDED ON 14/12/2010.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In W.P.No.23956/2024, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“a) Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to release interest of 12% per annum on pension as ordered in W.P.No.478/80/2018 C/w. 50532/2021 dated 14.07.2021 as per Annexure-C and also in the light of Division Bench
Order passed supra.
b) To pass any other order/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.”
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20682 WP No. 23956 of 2024 C/W WP No. 25757 of 2023
2. In W.P.No.25757/2023, the petitioners seek the following reliefs:
“a) Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to release interest of 12% per annum on pension as ordered in W.P.No.478-80/2018 C/W 11510/2018 dated 6.10.2020 as per Annexure-M and the same was confirmed in Division Bench in W.P.39634/2004 decided on 14.12.2010.
b) To pass any other order/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit under the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.”
3. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners in both petitions submits that the petitions may be disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to submit fresh representations to the concerned respondents, who may be directed to consider the said representations, in accordance with law.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitions stand disposed of by reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to submit a fresh representation before the respondents within a period of four weeks from today, who shall consider such representations to be filed by the petitioners and proceed further, in
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20682 WP No. 23956 of 2024 C/W WP No. 25757 of 2023
accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of filing of such representations by the petitioners.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39