1 CGHC010362462026 2026:CGHC:41855 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 898 of 2026 1 - Mohammad Sajid S/o Shri Anees Ahmad Aged About 31 Years Resident Moudhaha Para, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Rupendra Kumar Nishad S/o Dhannu Nishad Aged About 30 Years Resident House No. 944, Gali No. 1, Moudhaha Para, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Shoaib S/o Abdu- L Gaffar Khan Aged About 30 Years Resident Moudhaha Para, Firoz Manjil, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Dinesh Nishad S/o Thanwar Nishad Aged About 23 Years Resident Of Village Sarkata, Post Panduka, District Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Sameer Ajeem S/o Mohammad Ajeem Aged About 22 Years (Wrongly Written As Mohammad Ajeem), Resident Moudhaha Para, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.09.26 14:56:01 +0530 2 2 - Under Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur(C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan and Ms. Prachi Singh, Advocates For Respondents/ State : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Dy. Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 26/09/2026 1. This MCC has been filed seeking modification of the operative part of paragraph No.7 of the order dated 03.08.2026 passed by this Court in Writ Petition (S) No.9519 of 2025 and other connected matters. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the aforesaid writ petition was finally decided and disposed of by this Court vide order dated 03.08.2026. She submits that while passing the aforesaid order, the operative part of paragraph No.7 contains the words “as well as the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Uma Devi (Supra)”. She further submits that the Department of Finance, State of Chhattisgarh, had requested the Department of General Administration to re-examine the matter in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Uma Devi and Others, and thereafter, a meeting was convened by the General Administration 3 Department on 24.09.2024. 3. Learned counsel further submits that in the said meeting, the General Administration Department had already taken a decision that the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Uma Devi and Others is not applicable to the regularization of the services of the petitioners. She, therefore, submits that the words “as well as the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Uma Devi (Supra)” occurring in the operative part of paragraph No.7 of the order dated 03.08.2026 may be expunged/modified. 4. I have considered the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made and the facts of the case, the prayer made in the present MCC deserves to be allowed. 6. Accordingly, the operative part of paragraph No.7 of the order dated 03.08.2026 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.9519 of 2025 shall stand modified and shall read as under: “7. Accordingly, the WPS No. 9519/2025 is disposed of with a direction to the respondent authorities to take an appropriate decision in the present matter in light of the reply of the State in paragraph 8 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.” 7. The remaining contents of the order dated 03.08.2026 passed in Writ Petition (S) No.9519 of 2025 shall remain unaltered. 4 8. With the aforesaid modifications, the present MCC stands disposed of. 9. Let this order be made part of the record of Writ Petition (S) No.9519 of 2025. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar