Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36882 (PNJ)

PAWANDEEP KAUR AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/10287/2026 · 2026-08-26

To Be Nominated

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-10287 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT (110) PAWANDEEP KAUR AND ANR STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE Present: NEERJA K. KALSON 1. Constitution of India for issuance of protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent No.4 and also directing the official respondents to decide the representation dated 13.08.2026 (Annexure P 2. relationship. The private respondents are not accepting the said relationship and are extending threats to them. The copy of ‘Aadhaar’ cards (Annexures P-1 and P-2) of petitioners No.1 and 2 have been pl 10287-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PAWANDEEP KAUR AND ANR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEERJA K. KALSON Mr. Raghav Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Yatin Bunger, AAG, Punjab **** NEERJA K. KALSON, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of directions to respondents No. protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent No.4 and also directing the official respondents to decide the representation dated 3.08.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners. It is the case of the petitioners that they are in a live relationship. The private respondents are not accepting the said relationship and are extending threats to them. The copy of ‘Aadhaar’ cards (Annexures 2) of petitioners No.1 and 2 have been pl -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10287-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 26.08.2026 ......PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS NEERJA K. KALSON Mr. Yatin Bunger, AAG, Punjab This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the directions to respondents No.2 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent No.4 and also directing the official respondents to decide the representation dated 3) of the petitioners. e case of the petitioners that they are in a live-in relationship. The private respondents are not accepting the said relationship and are extending threats to them. The copy of ‘Aadhaar’ cards (Annexures 2) of petitioners No.1 and 2 have been placed on record. .....RESPONDENTS This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent No.4 and also directing the official respondents to decide the representation dated in relationship. The private respondents are not accepting the said relationship and are extending threats to them. The copy of ‘Aadhaar’ cards (Annexures ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.08.27 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10287-2026 -2- 3. Without commenting upon the validity of the relationship, and further keeping in view the law laid down by a Division Bench in Yash Pal and another Versus State of Haryana and others (CRWP No.4660 of 2021, decided on 09.09.2024), the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 13.08.2026 (Annexure P-3) and take requisite action, if so warranted, as per the facts and circumstances of the matter in accordance with law. 4. A copy of this order be sent to the office of the Advocate General, Punjab. (NEERJA K. KALSON) JUDGE 26.08.2026 Atul 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether reportable Yes/No ATUL KUMAR TRIPATHI 2026.08.27 10:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document