IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 COCP-3522-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.08.2026 Uma and another ...Petitioners Versus Himmat Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Praveen Kumar, DAG, Haryana for respondent Nos.2 and 3. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed for initiating proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for alleged wilful disobedience of order dated 16.03.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Writ Court in CWP-2815-2025 and connected matters. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of the present petition, the aforesaid order has since been complied with and the petitioners have been given appointment notionally with effect from the date on which the other candidates pursuant to the advertisement in question, were appointed. 3. In view of the above, he submits that the grievance does not SUMIT KUMAR 2026.08.27 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment COCP-3522-2026 (O&M) -2- survive and therefore, he prays that the present petition be disposed of as not pressed any further. 4. Disposed of as not pressed. 5. Rule stands discharged. (VIKAS SURI) August 26, 2026 JUDGE sumit.k Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether Reportable : Yes / No SUMIT KUMAR 2026.08.27 18:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment