Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 36864 (CAL)

MAHIDUL ISLAM KHAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/21215/2026 · 2026-08-31

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01 Ranajit (AR.CT) 31.08.2026 Ct.05 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. NO 21215 OF 2026 Mahidul Islam Khan -vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Pampa Dey (Dhabhal), Mr. Biswarup Chatterjee ….for the petitioner. Mr. Snehasis Banerjee ….for the respondent nos.8 to 22. Mr. Rudraman Bhttacharyya, Mr. Snehansu Majumder ….for the State. 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. At the time of call Ms. Dey (Dhabal), learned advocate representing petitioner on instruction submits that grievance of petitioner is redressed. 3. State respondents and respondent nos.8 to 22 are represented by learned advocates. 4. In view of such submission made on behalf of petitioner, no further order need be passed on this writ petition and same stands disposed of. 5. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)