IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49691 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2024 Thana- PATNA GRP CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Kundan Kumar S/o Bindeshwar Singh R/o - Saidpur, P.S.- Kadamkuan, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nityanand Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with GRP, Patna P.S.Case No. 180 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 393, 307, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 26.10.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.55611 of 2024 which reads as under:- “ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with GRP, Patna P.S.Case No. 180 of 2024 registered for the offence under section 393,307,302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49691 of 2025(4) dt.10-02-2026 2/3 perso 3. As per the prosecution case, one person was found in injured condition who was admitted to hospital where he died. Subsequently during investigation, it has come that unknown criminals had committed a loot and stabbed him be cause of which he died. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. There is no legal evidence against the petitioner and the petitioner has been arrested on the confessional statement of co-accused and, therefore, he deserves bail. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. the petitioner is accused of killing the deceased while trying to commit a loot. The petitioner was caught on the self inclupatory statement of co-accused. The petitioner has also confessed his guilt and on his statement, the lootted tiffin carrier has been recovered. The petitioner is in jail since 18.04.2024. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioenr and therefore, the present bail application is hereby rejected.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial has started and three witnesses have been examined. 5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49691 of 2025(4) dt.10-02-2026 3/3 perso order. 6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. N.K/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T