Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3685 (RAJ)

SALEEM S/O SADDIK v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3037/2026 · 2026-04-17

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16241] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3037/2026 Saleem S/o Saddik, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kalsavda Baas, Police Station Naugava, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3038/2026 Asif S/o Shri Baidulla, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Anchbadi, Police Station Chandraka, District Nuh (Hariyana) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/04/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.35/2026 registered at Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar, for the offence(s) under Sections 61(2), 240, 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act. [2026:RJ-JP:16241] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3037/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners and they are in custody since long. It is further contended that there is no transfer of money in the petitioners' accounts and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Saleem S/o Saddik and 2. Asif S/o Shri Baidulla, in connection with FIR No.35/2026, registered at Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for there appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-31-32